Skip to main content

Abbott says hepatitis C combo may be a blockbuster

1 reply [Last post]
John
John's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 17 hours ago
Joined: 09/03/2008

Abbott says hepatitis C combo may be a blockbuster

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Abbott Laboratories Inc said on Friday that it could have a shorter duration combination therapy for hepatitis C on the market in 2015 with annual sales potential of about $2 billion.

Significantly, its combination therapy does not include tough-to-tolerate interferon, which causes flu-like symptoms that lead many patients with the serious liver disease to stop or delay treatment.

Abbott said that in very small mid-stage trials, a combination of two of its experimental medicines and two other drugs were showing the potential for cure rates as high as 90 percent with as little as 12 weeks of therapy. The shortest duration current patients can hope for is 24 weeks.

Abbott discussed its hepatitis C trials and other experimental medicines at a meeting with investors and analysts in New York just two days after announcing it would spin off its prescription drugs business into a separate company.

"While early, these results are unprecedented in that very high cure rates are being achieved ... with only 12 weeks of interferon-free therapy," said Richard Gonzalez, who will head the new company.

The data presented by Abbott were culled from a pair of trials with a total of just 44 patients. Far larger trials would be needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy.

JPMorgan analyst Michael Weinstein was taking a cautious stance on the potential for Abbott's approach to hepatitis C.

"It's still early and there are a lot of other companies working in this space," he said.

One such company, Pharmasset Inc, has seen its shares soar in recent months over promising data for its own experimental interferon-free hepatitis C regimen. But Pharmasset shares fell as much as 20 percent after the Abbott presentation and were down 12 percent in afternoon trade.

"The market was expecting Pharmasset to be the first all-oral combination regimen for hepatitis C," said Brian Skorney, an analyst for Brean Murray, Carret & Co.

He believes the Pharmasset sell-off was an overreaction, given how little data Abbott has provided.

"I'd be interested to see what the safety profile will be for the four drugs," he said of the Abbott combination. "Pharmasset's is two drugs."

If the Abbott data were to hold up in much larger trials, its therapy could eclipse the new drugs from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc and Merck & Co that have been hailed as breakthroughs for achieving far-higher cure rates with the potential for shorter treatment durations than the older standard regimen of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, which had to be taken for 48 weeks.

Both the Merck and Vertex drugs must be taken along with interferon and ribavirin. Vertex, in its pivotal clinical trials, saw cure rates as high as 80 percent for its Incivek, while Merck's Vicrelis cured 66 percent of patients. Neither of the new regimens is taken for less than 24 weeks.

Shares of Vertex, which has just the one drug on the market, fell almost 3 percent.

The two Phase II trials of previously untreated patients combined the antiviral drug ritonavir with Abbott's ABT-450 -- a protease inhibitor from the same class as the Vertex and Merck drugs -- one of two Abbott polymerase inhibitors, ABT-333 or ABT-072, and ribavirin.

All patients who remained in the studies achieved an early virologic response at 12 weeks, meaning the virus was undetectable in the blood, Abbott said, with no virus rebounds occurring during therapy.

Of the 10 patients so far who were tested 24 weeks after completing the 12 weeks of therapy, nine had achieved a sustained virologic response, or SVR, the company said.

"In other words, these patients were cured with a 12-week course of therapy without interferon," Gonzalez said.

The regimen has been well tolerated to date, the company said, without discussing side effect details.

Hepatitis C, which if untreated can lead to cirrhosis, liver cancer and the need for a transplant, infects an estimated 4 million Americans, and 180 million worldwide.

Abbott plans to present more detailed data on these and other trials next year. It said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had given fast track status to the regimen.

With fast-track status a company can submit data from clinical trials on a rolling basis as it becomes available rather than waiting until pivotal Phase III studies are complete before submitting the results to the FDA.

Abbott shares were off 0.4 percent at $53.86.

(Reporting by Ransdell Pierson and Bill Berkrot, editing by Gerald E. McCormick)

anonymous (not verified)
anonymous's picture
IDSA: Hep B Vaccine Benefit Persists in HIV Patients

IDSA: Hep B Vaccine Benefit Persists in HIV Patients

in HIV patients, reported Capt. Elizabeth Rini, MD, from the San Antonio Military Medical Center in Texas.

"We observed a longer duration of hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) than previously reported," Rini said in her presentation at the annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The longest previous sustained response was a 40% response at five years in HIV-infected patients.

In her study's findings, the median time to a waned response was 8.26 years (95% CI 2.25 to 14.65), she said.

Rini and colleagues identified 186 individuals from the U.S. Military HIV Natural History Survey who were negative for hepatitis B viral infection. They received all their vaccines after their HIV diagnosis and had a positive initial vaccine response. The latter was defined as an HBsAb of ≥10 IU/L detected one to 12 months after the last vaccine dose.

The retrospective analysis included patients who were vaccinated between 1997 and 2009 and had at least one follow-up exam to determine antibody persistence. The primary endpoint of the study was the time to waned response of infection with hepatitis B virus.

The average age of the cohort was 33 years and the majority were men. About 44% of the cohort was African American; about 40% were Caucasian.

About 82.5% of the men were diagnosed with HIV during or after 1996. At last vaccination, the median CD4-positive cell count was 590 cells/mL.

Half the patients in the study had undetectable viral loads, while 30% had less than 10,000 copies/mL. Around 20% have viral loads greater than 10,000 copies/mL. Rini reported that 51.6% of the patients were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

"During the 570 patient-years of observation, hepatitis B surface antibody waned in 52 of the patients, or 28%," she said. Follow up was similar for both patients in which the vaccine effectiveness waned and in which the effectiveness persisted.

In trying to determine why the vaccine waned, the researchers ruled out age, sex, race and the era in which HIV was first detected. However, it did appear that patients with undetectable viral load (P=0.02), or lower viral loads (P=0.03) were less likely to experience waning of vaccine protection than patients with HIV viral loads greater than 10,000 copies/mL.

"An undetectable viral load at the time of last vaccination may improve hepatitis B vaccine response durability," Rini said.

She said that the military program which requires routine HIV testing leads to earlier HIV diagnosis. The open access to care and medication assures all troops of treatment, she noted. She also said the military contingent had a low rate of illicit drug use and low hepatitis C co-infection rates.

"The optimal interval to re-assess hepatitis B surface antibodies, and the need for booster dose of hepatitis B vaccine, is not clear," she said, although she suggested yearly reassessments might be useful.

"It is encouraging that these hepatitis B vaccine antibodies persist as long as eight years," commented Joel Gallant, MD, from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and the IDSA session moderator.

"I think it again points out the benefits of having a suppressed virus in order to respond to vaccinations which is something we have seen with other vaccines," he told MedPage Today. "I think it points out the importance of re-checking. A lot of doctors are good about checking serology at baseline, and they are good about vaccinating, and may even be good about checking vaccine response, but if it is positive, then they are done."

Gallant said he would suggest checking every five to 10 years to see if the seroresponse has been sustained. "Even for people without HIV, I would suggest that doctors check every 10 years of so to make sure you still have an antibody, and if you don't, get a booster shot," he said.

http://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/IDSA/29291

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
X
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Loading